AI-generated editorial illustration for the Deep Undress vs Wavespeed comparison — no real person depicted
AI-generated image (EU AI Act Art. 50 label). Editorial illustration — no real person depicted. See our AI content policy.

Deep Undress vs Wavespeed: Test Results Side by Side

Two ways to pay per action: stars inside a $9.99 weekly plan against a public $0.12 per run with no subscription. Deep Undress scored 8.8 on speed, Wavespeed 8.5 on documentation and price.

Updated: September 3, 2026Tested: Deep Undress Aug 14, 2026 · Wavespeed Aug 16, 2026Clothoff AI Editorial Team

Disclosure: We may earn a commission when you click a “Visit Site” link and sign up. Commissions don’t affect scores—see How we rate and our affiliate disclosure (FTC Endorsement Guides, 16 CFR Part 255).

8.8Deep Undress
Visit Site
8.5Wavespeed
Visit Site

Sponsored links · scores explained in How we rate

Verified: Sep 3, 2026

Deep Undress vs Wavespeed: Verified Facts Side by Side

Both columns use the same criteria and the same weights; nothing was re-tested for this page. Weights per How we rate: privacy 30% · quality 25% · price 20% · speed 15% · support 10%.

Sources: Editorial test Aug 14, 2026; documentary check Aug 25, 2026; live re-check Sep 3, 2026 failed (link via /go/deep-undress/); Editorial test Aug 16, 2026; documentary check Aug 25, 2026; privacy, retention and pricing pages accessed Sep 3, 2026 (link via /go/wavespeed/).
CriterionDeep UndressWavespeed
Editor score8.8/10 · tested Aug 14, 2026 · privacy 8.5 · quality 9.0 · price 8.6 · speed 9.7 · support 8.08.5/10 · tested Aug 16, 2026 · privacy 8.7 · quality 8.3 · price 9.0 · speed 9.0 · support 7.0
No-cost tierLimited courtesy trials offered at sign-up during the test$1 trial credit for eligible new accounts, no card required
Cost per image10 stars per image (8 with an active plan), 25 per short video (20 with a plan); entry plan $9.99 per week; no flat per-image price publishedClothes-changer model $0.12 per run (about 83 runs per $10); other models from $0.07 per image; video from $0.10 per second
Card requiredCard is the listed payment method for plans and credit packsNo card for the $1 trial; top-ups by card or PayPal; credits do not expire and are non-refundable
Consent rule statedNot publicly documented at test time — terms and data policy appear only after sign-upTerms of service are public; the privacy policy sets no adult-only gate and excludes only children under 13
Retention per policyNot publicly documented at test time; provider pages did not respond to a live check on Sep 3, 2026Generated media files expire automatically within 7 days; account data until deletion; residual backup copies may persist for a limited period
Speed in our sessionResults in seconds during the Aug 14 session, with no peak-hour difference observedUptime stable through the Aug 16 session; two or three parameter passes were needed per usable result
Route to remove an imageIn-account deletion and a contact form; no public NCII channel or 48-hour commitment found before sign-upAutomatic 7-day expiry of generated files; earlier deletion and account deletion via the support email
Commercial modelWeekly entry plan $9.99 plus stars; monthly and annual tiers; activation bonus of 80 to 200 starsPay-per-use credits, no subscription; account tiers by cumulative top-up; documented API

Prices are in U.S. dollars as displayed on September 3, 2026 and can change without notice; each provider’s own page is the binding source. Our editorial policy requires a retest within 90 days, by December 2, 2026. This is not legal advice.

Deep Undress leads 8.8/10

Verdict for Three Scenarios

Deep Undress leads 8.8 to 8.5. It won quality (9.0 vs 8.3), speed (9.7 vs 9.0) and support (8.0 vs 7.0); Wavespeed won privacy (8.7 vs 8.5) and price (9.0 vs 8.6). The pattern is consistent: Deep Undress is the faster, more polished consumer app whose terms hide behind sign-up; Wavespeed is the slower-to-learn platform that publishes its unit price and its retention window. Details in the Deep Undress review and the Wavespeed review.

Privacy-first

Wavespeed. Privacy sub-score 8.7 against 8.5. Wavespeed publishes a privacy policy, a separate data retention policy and terms of service; generated files expire within 7 days, and deletion is available on request. Its deductions: a Singapore-registered operator, residual backups that may persist briefly, and a children’s threshold of 13 instead of an adult-only gate. Deep Undress showed its terms and data policy only after sign-up, and its pages did not respond to a live check on Sep 3, 2026 — retention is not publicly documented.

Budget

Wavespeed. Price sub-score 9.0 against 8.6. You can calculate a Wavespeed bill before registering: $0.12 per clothes-changer run, about 83 runs per $10, a $1 trial credit, credits that never expire. Deep Undress charges 10 stars per image (8 with an active plan) on top of a $9.99 weekly entry plan, and publishes no star price, so a per-image cost cannot be fixed. The activation bonus of 80 to 200 stars helps in a project week, not over months.

Speed

Deep Undress. Speed sub-score 9.7 against 9.0 — the fastest queue in the current ranking, with results in seconds and no peak-hour difference in the Aug 14 session. Wavespeed’s uptime was stable through the Aug 16 session, but usable output took two or three parameter passes, which is what the seven-tenths gap measures.

Editorial analysis

What Separates Deep Undress and Wavespeed?

Both charge per action, and that is where the resemblance ends. Deep Undress wraps the action in a subscription: a weekly entry plan at $9.99, an activation bonus of 80 to 200 stars by tier, 10 stars per image or 8 with a plan, 25 or 20 per short video. Wavespeed removes the subscription: pay-per-use credits, a public $0.12 per run for the clothes-changer model, other models from $0.07 per image and video from $0.10 per second, plus a documented API.

Filters and consent are handled differently as well. Deep Undress’ consent rule is not publicly documented because the terms appear after sign-up; Wavespeed’s terms are public but its privacy policy excludes only children under 13. Neither offers a 48-hour NCII channel: Deep Undress has in-account deletion and a contact form, Wavespeed has 7-day auto-expiry and deletion by email. Compare both with the photo-to-photo tools on the clothes-removal apps page.

“Generated media files are temporary and generally expire within 7 days. This includes generated images, generated videos, generated audio, any other model outputs.”

— Wavespeed data retention policy, accessed September 3, 2026 (provider document; linked from the HTML version only via a disclosed sponsored link)

From the two reviews

Strengths and Weaknesses of Each Tool

Deep Undress — 8.8/10

Strengths

  • Speed sub-score 9.7: results in seconds with no peak-hour slowdown
  • Image and short-video output from one star balance
  • Presets that reduce manual parameter work
  • Activation bonus of 80 to 200 stars by plan tier

Weaknesses

  • Terms and data policy visible only after sign-up; retention not publicly documented
  • Weekly plan at $9.99 becomes costly for long-term use
  • Quality varies with source lighting and resolution; contact-form support only

Wavespeed — 8.5/10

Strengths

  • Public unit price: $0.12 per clothes-changer run, no subscription
  • The only tool of the pair with a published retention window: generated files expire within 7 days
  • $1 trial credit without a card; credits never expire
  • Documented developer API and a broad image and video model catalog

Weaknesses

  • Developer-style interface: two or three tuning passes before a usable result
  • Credits are non-refundable once purchased
  • Privacy policy sets a children’s threshold at 13 rather than an adult-only gate; support sub-score 7.0
Fit

Who Should Pick Deep Undress, and Who Should Pick Wavespeed?

Pick Deep Undress If

  • You want the fastest and most consistent queue in the ranking for a concentrated project week.
  • You want presets and short video in one consumer interface, not a parameter console.
  • You can accept a $9.99 weekly plan as a trial before a monthly or annual tier.

Pick Wavespeed If

  • Your usage is occasional and you want the exact cost — $0.12 per run — known before paying.
  • You need API access or a wider model catalog and can tune parameters.
  • You want a written 7-day retention window and public terms before you sign up.

Full test notes: Deep Undress review · Wavespeed review. Both tools sit in our clothes-removal apps; other pairs are on the compare hub.

Visit Site Visit Site All Reviews

Sponsored links

Method

Editorial Test Notes

  • Comparison compiled on September 3, 2026 from the editorial tests of Aug 14, 2026 (Deep Undress) and Aug 16, 2026 (Wavespeed), both hands-on with the team’s own control photos; no new session was run.
  • Deep Undress pages did not respond to an automated fetch on Sep 3, 2026; Wavespeed’s privacy, retention and pricing pages were re-read the same day through the disclosed sponsored link.
  • Open item: Deep Undress publishes no star price per package, so its cost per image cannot be set against Wavespeed’s $0.12 per run in dollars; scheduled for the retest within 90 days (by November 12, 2026 for Deep Undress).
Consent and safety

Consent Note

Deep Undress and Wavespeed are third-party services. Clothoff AI does not operate them, does not process or store images, and receives a commission only through the sponsored “Visit Site” links on this page (affiliate disclosure). Legal context: are undress apps legal in the US, TAKE IT DOWN Act explainer, state age verification, DMCA. Not legal advice.

Sponsored links

Frequently asked questions

FAQ About Deep Undress vs Wavespeed

Which scored higher, Deep Undress or Wavespeed?

Deep Undress, 8.8/10 against 8.5/10, tested on Aug 14 and Aug 16, 2026. It won quality 9.0 to 8.3, speed 9.7 to 9.0 and support 8.0 to 7.0; Wavespeed won privacy 8.7 to 8.5 and price 9.0 to 8.6. Weights (privacy 30%, quality 25%, price 20%, speed 15%, support 10%) are on How we rate.

Which is cheaper per image?

Only Wavespeed lets you calculate it before paying: $0.12 per clothes-changer run, about 83 runs per $10, no subscription. Deep Undress charges 10 stars per image, or 8 with an active plan, on a $9.99 weekly entry plan, but publishes no star price per package, so the comparison in dollars cannot be closed until the retest.

Which one is faster?

Deep Undress: results in seconds during the Aug 14, 2026 session with no peak-hour slowdown, the fastest queue in the ranking and a 9.7 speed sub-score. Wavespeed’s uptime was stable throughout the Aug 16 session, but its default parameters needed two or three tuning passes before output was usable, which is why it sits at 9.0.

Does either require a subscription?

Wavespeed does not: you top up credits that never expire and pay $0.12 per run, starting with a $1 trial credit without a card. Deep Undress starts from a plan — $9.99 per week at entry, monthly and annual tiers above — and the plan lowers the star cost of each action from 10 to 8 while it stays active.

Which one deletes my images sooner?

Wavespeed publishes the only window: generated media files expire within 7 days, with earlier deletion on request through the support email. Deep Undress retention is not publicly documented — its terms appear after sign-up and its pages did not respond on Sep 3, 2026. The catalog is compared in how long undress apps keep your photos.

What about filters and consent rules?

Neither publishes a consent rule in the upload flow. Deep Undress shows its terms only after sign-up; Wavespeed’s terms are public, but its privacy policy excludes only children under 13 rather than gating adults. The editorial team applies its own rule — photos of yourself or consenting adults 18+ only — described on Responsible AI.

How do I get an image removed?

Wavespeed: generated files expire within 7 days, and earlier deletion or account deletion goes through the support email named in its policy. Deep Undress: in-account deletion and a contact form; no public NCII channel or 48-hour commitment was found before sign-up. U.S. residents can also use the routes on Report NCII.